رویکرد تحلیل مرز دوگانه برای تولید وزن در فرآیند تحلیل سلسله‌مراتبی

نویسنده
حسین عزیزی
دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، مغان
چکیده
تحلیل پوششی داده‌ها (DEA) در ترکیب با فرآیند تحلیل سلسله‌مراتبی (AHP)، روش DEAHP را برای اشتقاق و تجمیع وزن‌ها در AHP ایجاد می‌کند. این مقاله برای اشتقاق اولویت در AHP، رویکرد «تحلیل مرز دوگانه» را پیشنهاد می‌کند که مفهوم وزن متغیر ‏DEA‏ را از دو دیدگاه خوشبینانه و ‏بدبینانه با ‏AHP‏ ادغام می‌کند، و مطلوب‌ترین و نامطلوب‌ترین وزن‌ها را بر مبنای یک ماتریس مقایسه‌ی دو به دو ‏برای معیارها یا گزینه‌های تصمیم به دست می‌آورد. رویکرد پیشنهادی می‌تواند بر نقایص DEAHP غلبه کند، و برآورد بهتری از اولویت‌ها به دست آورد و تصمیمات بهتری نسبت به DEAHP ارائه نماید. دو مثال عددی، از جمله یک کاربرد واقعی AHP برای استخدام یک دستیار پژوهشی برای یک پروژه‌ی تحقیقاتی ارائه می‌شوند، تا مزایای رویکرد پیشنهادی و کاربردهای بالقوه‌ی آن را در تحلیل تصمیم چندمعیاری مشخص کنند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
تحلیل پوششی داده‌ها
فرآیند تحلیل سلسله‌مراتبی
‌DEAHP
تحلیل مرز دوگانه
تحلیل تصمیم ‌چندمعیاری

عنوان مقاله English

Double-Frontier Analysis Approach for Weight Derivation in ‎Analytical Hierarchy Process

نویسنده English

Hossein Azizi
چکیده English

Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) combined with Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) provides Data Envelopment Analytic Hierarchy Process (DEAHP) methodology for weight derivation and aggregation. A double-frontier analysis approach is proposed in this article to derive priorities in AHP. The proposed method combines DEA variable weight with AHP from both optimistic and pessimistic views to obtain the most desirable and undesirable weights based on a pairwise comparison matrix for decision criteria or alternatives. This approach is able to eliminate DEAHP drawbacks to provide an improved estimate of priorities and better decisions than DEAHP. Two numerical examples including a real AHP application to recruit a research fellow for a research project were presented to demonstrate advantages of the proposed method and its potential applications in multiple-criteria decision analysis.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Data envelopment analysis
Analytical Hierarchy Process
DEAHP
double-frontier analysis
‎‎multiple-criteria decision analysis
Saaty T.L., "Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with the analytic hierarchy process", Pittsburgh: RWS Publications; 2000.

2. Chu A.T.W., Kalaba R.E., Spingarn K., "A comparison of two methods for determining the weights of belonging to fuzzy sets", Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 27(4), (1979) 531–538.

3. Crawford G.B., "The geometric mean procedure for estimating the scale of a judgment matrix", Mathematical Modelling, 9(3-5), (1987) 327–334.

4. Saaty T.L., Vargas L.G., "Comparison of eigenvalue, logarithmic least squares and least squares methods in estimating ratios", Mathematical Modelling, 5(5), (1984) 309–324.

5. Cogger K.O., Yu P.L., "Eigenweight vectors and least-distance approximation for revealed preference in pairwise weight ratios", Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 46(4), (1985) 483–491.

6. Islei G., Lockett A.G., "Judgemental modelling based on geometric least square", European Journal of Operational Research, 36(1), (1988) 27–35.

7. Bryson N., "A goal programming method for generating priority vectors", Journal of the Operational Research Society, 46(5), (1995) 641–648.

8. Bryson N., Joseph A., "Generating consensus priority point vectors: a logarithmic goal programming approach", Computers & Operations Research, 26(6), (1999) 637–643.

9. Mikhailov L., "A fuzzy programming method for deriving priorities in the analytic hierarchy process", Journal of the Operational Research Society, 51(3), (2000) 341–349.

10. Mikhailov L., "Group prioritization in the AHP by fuzzy preference programming method", Computers & Operations Research, 31(2), (2004) 293–301.

11. Lipovetsky S., Conklin W.M., "Robust estimation of priorities in the AHP", European Journal of Operational Research, 137(1), (2002) 110–22.

12. Beynon M.J., "Understanding local ignorance and non-specificity within the DS/AHP method of multi-criteria decision making", European Journal of Operational Research, 163(2), (2005) 403–417.



13. Beynon M., "DS/AHP method: a mathematical analysis, including an understanding of uncertainty", European Journal of Operational Research, 140(1), (2002) 148–164.

14. Beynon M., Curry B., Morgan P., "The Dempster–Shafer theory of evidence: an alternative approach to multicriteria decision modeling", Omega, 28(1), (2000) 37–50.

15. Shafer G., "A mathematical theory of evidence", Princeton: Princeton University Press; 1976.

16. Gass S.I., Rapcsák T., "Singular value decomposition in AHP", European Journal of Operational Research, 154(3), (2004) 573–584.

17. Laininen P., Hämäläinen R.P., "Analyzing AHP-matrices by regression", European Journal of Operational Research, 148(3), (2003) 514–524.

18. Stam A., Silva A.P.D., "On multiplicative priority rating methods for the AHP", European Journal of Operational Research, 145(1), (2003) 92–108.

19. Sugihara K., Ishii H., Tanaka H., "Interval priorities in AHP by interval regression analysis", European Journal of Operational Research, 158(3), (2004) 745–754.

20. Chandran B., Golden B., Wasil E., "Linear programming models for estimating weights in the analytic hierarchy process", Computers & Operations Research, 32(9), (2005) 2235–2254.

21. Srdjevic B., "Combining different prioritization methods in the analytic hierarchy process synthesis", Computers & Operations Research, 32(7), (2005) 1897–1919.

22. Wang Y.-M., Parkan C., Luo Y. "Priority estimation in the AHP through maximization of correlation coefficient", Applied Mathematical Modelling, 31(12), (2007) 2711–2718.

23. Vaidya O.S., Kumar S., "Analytic hierarchy process: an overview of applications", European Journal of Operational Research, 169(1), (2006) 1–29.

24. Ramanathan R., "Data envelopment analysis for weight derivation and aggregation in the analytic hierarchy process", Computers & Operations Research, 33(5), (2006) 1289–1307.

25. Yang T., Kuo C., "A hierarchical AHP/DEA methodology for the facilities layout design problem", European Journal of Operational Research, 147(1), (2003) 128–136.

26. Ertay T., Ruan D., Tuzkaya U.R., "Integrating data envelopment analysis and analytic hierarchy for the facility layout design in manufacturing systems", Information Sciences, 176(3), (2006) 237–262.



27. Sinuany-Stern Z., Mehrez A., Hadad Y., "An AHP/DEA methodology for ranking decision making units", International Transactions in Operational Research, 7(2), (2000) 109–124.

28. Wang Y.-M., Chin K.-S., Poon G.K.K., "A data envelopment analysis method with assurance region for weight generation in the analytic hierarchy process", Decision Support Systems, 45(4), (2008) 913–921.

29. Azizi H., Wang Y.-M., "Improved DEA models for measuring interval efficiencies of decision-making units", Measurement, 46(3), (2013) 1325-1332.

30. Amirteimoori A., "DEA efficiency analysis: Efficient and anti-efficient frontier", Applied Mathematics and Computation, 186, (2007) 10-16.

31. Wang Y.M., Lan Y.X., "Measuring Malmquist productivity index: A new approach based on double frontiers data envelopment analysis", Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 54, (2011) 2760–2771.

32. Wang Y.M., Luo Y., "DEA efficiency assessment using ideal and anti-ideal decision making units", Applied Mathematics and Computation, 173, (2006) 902-915.

33. Wang Y.M., Chin K.S., "A new approach for the selection of advanced manufacturing technologies: DEA with double frontiers", International Journal of Production Research, 47, (2009) 6663-6679.

34. Foroughi A.A., Aouni B., "Ranking units in DEA based on efficiency intervals and decision-maker’s preferences", International Transactions in Operational Research, 19, (2012) 567–579.

35. Chen J.X., "A comment on DEA efficiency assessment using ideal and anti-ideal decision making units", Applied Mathematics and Computation, 219, (2012) 583–591.

36. Hatami-Marbini A., Saati S., Tavana M., "An ideal-seeking fuzzy data envelopment analysis framework", Applied Soft Computing, 10, (2010) 1062–1070.

37. Mirhedayatian S.M., Vahdat S.E., Jafarian Jelodar M., Farzipoor Saen R., "Welding process selection for repairing nodular cast iron engine block by integrated fuzzy data envelopment analysis and TOPSIS approaches", Materials and Design, 43, (2013) 272–282.



38. Amirteimoori A., Azizi H., Kordrostami S., "Double frontier two-stage fuzzy data envelopment analysis", International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems, 28(1), (2020) 117–152.

39. عزیزی حسین، حسین‌زاده حسن، رتبه‌بندی واحدهای تصمیم‌گیری با استفاده از رویکرد تحلیل مرز دوگانه، مجله تحقیق در عملیات و ‌کاربردهای آن، دوره‌ی 17، شماره‌ی 1، 118-103، بهار 1399.

40. عزیزی حسین، مدل‌های جدیدی برای انتخاب ارائه دهندگان طرف ثالث تدارکات معکوس در حضور عوامل متعدد دارای نقش دوگانه: ‌یک رویکرد تحلیل پوششی داده‌ها با مرز دوگانه، تصمیم‌گیری و تحقیق در عملیات، دورۀ 5، شمارۀ 2، 232-221، تابستان ‌‌1399.

41. عزیزی حسین، فرضی‌پور صائن رضا، انتخاب بهترین فناوری در حضور هر دو نوع داده‌های اصلی و ترتیبی: ‌DEA‌ با مرزهای کارآ و ‌ناکارآ، فصلنامه مدیریت توسعه و تحول، دوره‌ی 1395، شماره‌ی 26، 23-13، پاییز 1395.

42. عزیزی حسین، یک رویکرد جدید مبتنی بر تحلیل پوششی داده‌ها با مرز دوگانه برای رتبه‌بندی قواعد کشف شده از داده‌کاوی، ‌پژوهش‌های نوین در ریاضی، دوره‌ی 4، شماره‌ی 13، 30-17، بهار 1397.

43. Doyle J.R., Green R.H., Cook W.D., "Upper and lower bound evaluation of multiattribute objects: Comparison models using linear programming", Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 64, (1995) 261-273.

44. Entani T., Maeda Y., Tanaka H., "Dual models of interval DEA and its extension to interval data", European Journal of Operational Research, 136, (2002) 32-45.

45. Jahed R., Amirteimoori A., Azizi H. "Performance measurement of decision-making units under uncertainty conditions: An approach based on double frontier analysis", Measurement, 69, (2015) 264-279.

46. Hwang C.L., Yoon K., "Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications", Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1981.

47. Wang Y.-M., Chin K.-S., Yang J.-B., "Measuring the performances of decision-making units using geometric average efficiency", Journal of the Operational Research Society, 58(7), (2007) 929–937.

48. Wang Y.-M., Chin K.-S., "A new data envelopment analysis method for priority determination and group decision making in the analytic hierarchy process", European Journal of Operational Research, 195(1), (2009) 239–250.