برآورد ناپارامتری مخاطره فضایی میدان تصادفی نامانای در میانگین

نویسندگان
دانشگاه تربیت مدرس
چکیده
اغلب روش‌های مرسوم برآورد مخاطره فضایی، برای میدان‌های تصادفی مانا ارائه شده‌­اند و برای سادگی با پذیره‌ معلوم بودن توزیع داده‌ها یک مدل پارامتری به تابع تغییرنگار برازش داده می­شود. در این مقاله یک روش فضایی ناپارامتری برای برآورد مخاطره فضایی ارائه می‌شود، که در آن توابع روند و تغییرنگار با برآوردگرهای خطی موضعی مدل‌بندی و با تصحیح اریبی مانده‌ها یک مدل ناپارامتری معتبر به تغییرنگار برازش داده خواهد شد. سپس با روش بوت‌استرپ، مخاطره فضایی در موقعیت‌های جدید محاسبه و پهنه‌بندی آن تهیه می‌شود. روش فضایی ناپارامتری برای برآورد مخاطره شرطی سازوار می‌شود و با مخاطره حاصل از کریگیدن نشانگر مورد ارزیابی و مقایسه قرار می‌گیرد. به علاوه دقت روش فضایی ناپارامتری در مطالعات شبیه‌سازی و به کارگیری برای داده‌های دمای هوای ایران مورد بررسی و ارزیابی قرار می‌گیرد.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Nonparametric Estimation of Spatial Risk for a Mean Nonstationary Random Field}

نویسندگان English

Mohammad Moghadam
Mohsen Mohammadzadeh
Tarbiat Modares University
چکیده English

Introduction

Estimating the spatial hazard, or in other words, the probability of exceeding a certain boundary is one of the important issues in environmental studies that are used to control the level of pollution and prevent damage from natural disasters. Risk zoning provides useful information to decision-makers; For example, in areas where spatial hazards are high, zoning is used to design preventive policies to avoid adverse effects on the environment or harm to humans.

Generally, the common spatial risk estimating methods are for stationary random fields. In addition, a parametric form is usually considered for the distribution and variogram of the random field. Whereas in practice, sometimes these assumptions are not realistic. For an example of these methods, we can point to the Indicator kriging, Disjunctive kriging, Geostatistical Markov Chain, and simple kriging. In practice utilize the parametric spatial models caused unreliable results. In this paper, we use a nonparametric spatial model to estimate the unconditional probability or spatial risk:

rcs0=PZs0⩾c. (1)

Because the conditional distribution at points close to the observations has less variability than the unconditional probability, nonparametric spatial methods will be used to estimate the unconditional probability.

Material and methods

Let Z=Zs1,…,ZsnT be an observation vector from the random field {Zs;s∈D⊆Rd} which is decomposed as follows

Zsss, (2)

where μ(s) is the trend and ε(s) is the error term, that is a second-order stationary random field with zero mean and covariogram Ch=Covεss+h. The local linear model for the trend is given by

μHs= e1TSsTWsSs-1 SsTWsZϕTsZ,

where e1 is a vector with 1 in the first entry and all other entries 0, Ss is a matrix with ith row equal to (1, (si-s)T), Ws = diag {KHs1s,…,KH(sn-s)}, KHu=H-1K(H-1u), K is a triple multiplicative multivariate kernel function and H is a nonsingular symmetric d×d bandwidth matrix. In this model, the bandwidth matrix obtained from a bias corrected and estimated generalized cross-validation (CGCV).

From nonparametric residuals ε(s) = Z(s) -μ(s) a local linear estimate of the variogram 2 γ(⋅)is obtained as the solution of the following least-squares problem




minα.βi

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Bandwidth
Bias corrected of variogram
Bootstrap
Local linear estimator
Spatial risk
1. ایرانپناه، ن. و محمدزاده، م.، (1386)، ”روش بوت استرپ بلوک مجزا در آمار فضایی“، نشریه علوم دانشگاه تربیت معلم، 5، 665-653.

2. محمدزاده، م.، ایرانپناه، ن. و افشار، س.، (1386)، ”تصحیح اریبی برآورد پارامترهای تغییرنگار به روش بوت-استرپ بلوک مجزا برای پیشگویی فضایی“، مجله علوم دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز، 18، 52-46.

3. محمدزاده، م. (1398)، آمار فضایی و کاربردهای آن، چاپ سوم، مرکز نشر آثار علمی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران.

4. Cameletti, M., Ignaccolo, R. and Sylvan, D. (2013), “Assessment and Visualization of Threshold Exceedance Probabilities in Complex Space-Time Settings: A Case Study of Air Quality in Northern Italy”, Spatial Statistics, 5, 57–68.

5. Castillo-Páez, S., Fernández-Casal, R., García-Soidán, P. (2019), “A Nonparametric Bootstrap Method for Spatial Data”, Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 137, 1-15.

6. Chiles, J. and Delfiner, P. (2012), Geostatistics: Modeling Spatial Uncertainty, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York.

7. Cressie, N. (1993), Statistics for Spatial Data, Wiley, New York.

8. Draghicescu, D. and Ignaccolo, R. (2009), “Modeling Threshold Exceedance Probabilities of Spatially Correlated Time Series”, Electronic Journal of Statistics, 3, 149–164.

9. Fan, J. and Gijbels, I. (1996), Local Polynomial Modelling and Its Applications, Chapman and Hall, London.

10. Fernandez-Casal, R. and Francisco-Fernandez, M. (2014), “Nonparametric Bias-Corrected Variogram Estimation Under Nonconstant Trend”, Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 28, 1247–1259.

11. Fernandez-Casal, R., Gonzalez-Manteiga, W. and Febrero-Bande, M. (2003), “Space-Time Dependency Modeling Using General Classes of Flexible Stationary Variogram Models”, Journal of Geophysical Research, 108, 108-8779.

12. Fernández-Casal, R., Castillo-Páez, S. and Francisco-Fernández, M. (2018a), “Nonparametric Geostatistical Risk Mapping”, Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 32, 675-684.

13. Fernández-Casal, R., Castillo-Páez, S. and Francisco-Fernández, M. (2018b), “Nonparametric Approximation of Conditional Risk in Non-Stationary Geostatistics Processes”, 9th Workshop on Spatio-Temporal Modelling, Montpellier, 2018.

14. Francisco-Fernandez, M. and Opsomer, J. D. (2005), “Smoothing Parameter Selection Methods for Nonparametric Regression with Spatially Correlated Errors”, Canadian Journal of Statistics, 33, 539–558.

15. Garcia-Soidan, P. and Menezes, R. (2012), “Estimation of the Spatial Distribution Through the Kernel Indicator Variogram”, Environmetrics, 23, 535–548.

16. Goovaerts, P., Webster. R. and Dubois, J. P. (1997), “Assessing the Risk of Soil Contamination In the Swiss Jura Using Indicator Geostatistics”, Environmental and Ecology Statistics, 4, 49–64.

17. Guardiola-Albert, C. and Pardo-Iguzquiza, E. (2011), “Compositional Bayesian Indicator Estimation”, Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 25, 835–849.

18. Haining, R. (1991), Spatial Data Analysis in the Social and Environmental Sciences, Cambridge University Press.

19. Iranpanah, N., Mohammadzadeh, M., and Taylor, C. C., (2011), “A Comparison of Block and Semi-Parametric Bootstrap Methods for Variance Estimation in Spatial Statistics”, Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 55, 578-587.

20. Iranpanah, N., Mohammadzadeh, M. and Vahidi Asl, M. G. (2009), “Optimum Block Size in Separate Block Bootstrap to Estimate the Variance of Sample Mean for Lattice Data”, Journal of Sciences, Islamic Republic of Iran, 20, 355-364.

21. Journel, A. (1983), “Nonparametric Estimation of Spatial Distributions”, Mathematical Geology, 15, 445–468.

22. Li, W., Zhang. C., Dey, D. and Wang, S. (2010), “Estimating Threshold exceeding Probability Maps of Environmental Variables with Markov Chain Random Fields”, Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 24, 1113–1126.

23. Oliver, M. A., Webster, R. and Mcgrath, S. P. (1996), “Disjunctive Kriging for Environmental Management”, Environmetrics, 7, 333–357.

24. Opsomer, J. D., Wang, Y. and Yang, Y. (2001), “Nonparametric Regression with Correlated Errors”, Statistical Science, 16, 134–153.

25. Shapiro, A. and Botha. J. D. (1991), “Variogram Fitting with a General Class of Conditionally Nonnegative Definite Functions”, Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, 11, 87–96.

26. Singh, K. (1981), “On the Asymptatic Accuracy of the Efron's Bootstrap”, The Annals of Statistics, 9, 1187-1195.

27. Tolosana-Delgado, R., Pawlowsky-Glahn, V. and Egozcue, J. J. (2008), “Indicator Kriging without Order Relation Violations”, Mathematical Geosciences, 40, 327–347.

28. Wand, M.P. (1994), “Fast Computation of Multivariate Kernel Estimators”, Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 3, 433-445.